The HMinfo Research Library contains an in-depth collection of materials on home modifications and related subjects.
The Research Library does not lend books and other items. Under special circumstances, requests to use the library may be made by emailing .
OBJECTIVES: To examine the effect on mobility selfefficacy of a multifactorial, individualized, occupational/ physical therapy (OT/PT) intervention delivered via teletechnologyor in-home visits. DESIGN: Randomized, clinical trial. SETTING: One Department of Veterans Affairs and one private rehabilitation hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five community-dwelling adults with new mobility devices. Thirty-three were randomized to the control or usual care group (UCG), 32 to the intervention group (IG). INTERVENTION: Four, once-weekly, 1-hour OT/PT sessions targeting three mobility and three transfer tasks. A therapist delivered the intervention in the traditional home setting (trad group n516) or remotely via teletechnology (tele group n516). MEASUREMENTS: Ten-item Likert-scale measure of mobility self-efficacy. RESULTS: The IG had a statistically significantly greater increase in overall self-efficacy over the study period than the UCG (mean change: IG 8.8, 95% confidence interval (CI)53.8–13.7; UCG 1.2, 95% CI5 5.8–8.2). Descriptively, the IG exhibited positive changes in self-efficacy for all tasks and greater positive change than the UCG on all items with the exception of getting in and out of a chair. Comparisons of the two treatment delivery methods showed a medium standardized effect size (SES) in both the tele and trad groups, although it did not reach statistical significance for the tele group (SES: tele50.35, 95% CI5 2.5–0.95; trad50.54, 95% CI50.06–1.14). CONCLUSION: A multifactorial, individualized, homebased OT/PT intervention can improve self-efficacy in mobility-impaired adults. The trend toward increased self efficacy irrespective of the mode of rehabilitation delivery suggests that telerehabilitation can be a viable alternative to or can augment traditional in-home therapy. J Am Geriatr Soc 54:1641–1648, 2006.
Reads 266
Back